cause your a guy and Heaven,I would do the same thing. Nothing gets resolved with violence. :moogle:
Only problem is, if you actually did that in the real world, you would be arrested, charged with first-degree murder, and convicted. And rightly so!
I avoid situations like that on purpose.
Actually, I think the drummer’s hotter than billie =\
In that (nearly impossible) scenario, where it is impossible to negotiate or just talk your way in a compromise where nobody dies, then yes, killing someone else > getting killed, that’s just survival logic. While some people feel so much despair and crap that they want to die, few people would willingly want to die at another person’s hands.
The standard scenario isn’t that the other guy WOULD kill you, just that he has the ability to, and you have the ability to kill him. The idea is you have no way of communicating with each other and knowing what the other guy is thinking. Obviously the best result is for neither of you to do anything, but the question is should you kill the other guy before he kills you.
Probably the one and only time I’m going to agree with you. :hahaha;
btw. Your avatar sucks more than greenday and blink 128 combined into one evil band…
just shoot him in the penis and he’ll be too preoccupied to care about you
I think that would make him want to kill you more
stupidhead
That makes it sound alot like Game Theory or the Realist Perspective of international affairs then, CH. That would make the best scenario to actually be killing him before he kills you. Since you have no way of knowing what he would do, the best scenario to preserve your existence would be to kill him first on the off chance he might decide to kill you, as neither of you have the means to truly communicate you wish the other one no harm. Of course, this theory is more applicable for economics and dealing with other countries than every day dealings.
Find a place with people. He probably doesn’t want to kill them. Then with the people as witnesses get his ass thrown in jail.
Then live the life of an assassin filled with zany hijinks to pay the hospital to keep him alive?
I think you misinterpreted what I said 984. The best end result (as in, after you both lost the ability to kill each other) would be to have both parties alive.
Edit: And I know this is a tautology, I was just trying to clarify. 
Yes. Yes it would, Chuh.
I’d use basic CQC techniques to throw him onto the ground, and then pick him up, and slit his throat.
No no no, he is standing there, on the opposite side of the room. You have no superpowers that enable you to disarm him (Don’t act like you would actually be able to). He HATES YOU, you are the bane of his existance. If he COULD kill you, he would do it right then and there. You are standing on the opposite side of the room, and you have to decide if you are going to kill him or not (You HAVE the ability to kill him, you could do it right now). There is no talking out of it, the bottom line is HE WILL KILL YOU IF HE CAN, but you do not know if he can or not (Basically, either he has a button that can kill you, or he doesn’t, he MIGHT. You do have a button that can kill him). There is no talking, are you going to kill him or choose to risk it?
Edit: If you kill him no one would ever know but you, you would get in no trouble.
Once again, risking it would be the stupidest thing someone could do. You are going to kill him, whether you believe in murdering or not. I’m sorry, but if you say something like “I would rather die than kill someone,” I do not believe you, not one bit.
Hades: This is not about Saw, it is about someone saying one of the dumbest things I have ever seen. Check out the topic, it’s on the front page.
Sorry, let me correct my previous post.
I’d use basic CQC techniques to throw him onto the ground, then pick him up, and slit his throat with my magic kill-button.
I would cast planeshift, then telekinetic sphere, and send him into the astral plane.
Taking this totally seriously…
Once again, risking it would be the stupidest thing someone could do. You are going to kill him, whether you believe in murdering or not. I’m sorry, but if you say something like “I would rather die than kill someone,” I do not believe you, not one bit.
Go ahead, don’t believe me, but I wouldn’t want to kill him. I believe that I don’t fear death, and I’d like to say that I wouldn’t. TBH, I could be happier in death than in life, but I’d never know, right?
All I can say is that I wouldn’t want to kill him, and I would do everything in my power to not kill him. If that means dying myself, then so be it. Whether you believe me or not, I don’t care. It’s really one of those situations that you have to be in to know for sure, but I’d like to say that I wouldn’t, under any circumstances, kill him.
First of all, the point is moot if only because there is no background to the story. Even if you say it’s in another topic, you did not list the topic here, ergo, there is no background.
Say, if person A meets person B. Person B might be armed. Person A IS armed. The two have absolutely nothing against each other. They do not know each other. They do not have political, ethnical, nor any other affiliation thereof. They will meet, have a passing thought that this may be an hostile individual, but without any further proof, both men, even if person A has a superior advantage, most likely won’t do much of anything to do it. Person A will most likely take person B prisoner and try to gain some sort of advantage from that person. A human, to another human, is more valuable live than dead if that human does not have the means to fight back. The way you tell the story, is that he has small means of fighting back, but you could easily dispatch him if he even-so manifests the intention of killing you.
Secondly, even if you do add a situation where both men are forced to fight against each other, it all depends on circumstances and evidence you have. If you clearly have the superior weaponry/power, why would the person attempt to kill you unless they are sure that you are going to kill them? They will most likely surrender as to not risk their own life. After all, the survival instinct is superior to martyrdom except in brainwashed cases. Suicide doesn’t count, as it’s a voluntary decision overriding instincts.
Thirdly, if you put a situation where that person will die either way, he will attack you no matter the disadvantage he would have in the fight. Ergo, the point is moot as you know his intention.
You see, Ramz, there’s a LOT of things you need to consider before even thinking of that question. If you do not consider them, then you have no right to moralize us in our choices.
And yes, I dodged the question. I’m just a son of a bitch like that.
Iga, read the goddamn question again. I TOLD you that person B HATES person A. He is going to kill you with a button that killspeople if he HAS it. He might not have it. Whatever the hell you just said makes no sense. Person B WILL kill Person A if he CAN. Person A CAN kill Person B. You are Person A, what do you do?
And I am veeeeery sorry if you cannot tell what topic I am talking about.