Shrine Opinions...

Originally posted by StarStorm
[b]Yes, yes, this is necroposting. I don’t care.

This is the final version of the monster list. I added anchors, split up the monster list more evenly (Although I imagine it’ll be hell to load, want to do one without pictures… another time) and brushed it up a bit.

http://tartarus.rpgclassics.com/~mm7/monsterlist.shtml (A-K)
http://tartarus.rpgclassics.com/~mm7/monsterlist2.shtml (L-Z) [/b]

That is so amazing no word can describe it.
Because of that, I must make my own new word to describe it’s greatness.

<i><b>SCRUMTRILESSENT!</b></i>

Good lord… Gizamaluke, it’s a monster list, not an orgasm.

I would arrange the anchor list in a table too, but other than that it looks pretty good. Make sure all the colors show up well and are legible on our background too. And, you could make the table labels yellow or light green instead of white, I tell that to every new shriner though :stuck_out_tongue:

Very nice, SS! The colors work well with the background, and the border adds a nice touch! Well done!

In fact, I could learn a few things from this example.

Hey i’m putting a lot of work into it, but I hope it’ll be good. I implemented Merlin’s idea. I’m glad he liked it though, that says a lot. thanks for your compliments, I really need to work on the ent page now though.

Added the Text-Only Monster Lists. What do you all think?

http://tartarus.rpgclassics.com/~mm7/monsterlistt.shtml
http://tartarus.rpgclassics.com/~mm7/monsterlistt2.shtml

Originally posted by StarStorm
Good lord… Gizamaluke, it’s a monster list, not an orgasm.

Hey! Monster lists have feelings too!

<html:purist>
Whacks Spaz with a stick

Dammit Spaz, mark up lists as lists, not as tables! =P
</html:purist>

lastly, and this can wait until you’re ready for us to review the shrine formally, go through all your tables of anchors and make sure all of them are correct. I’m not saying any of them are incorrect right now, they might be all right, but it should be double-checked beforehand since it’s likely not to be noticed by too many.

Well, for just asthetics, it looks really good, the format is good for displaying information. The only thing I really have to say about it is that If you wanted it to look really neat, you could put each unit type in its own little sub-table and that would give each unit its own border separating it instead of the empty blue space. The drawback, though, is that it’d take a fairly long time to rewrite all the code.

Not really. All I’d have to do is search for the specific TD tag for the break and replace it with the end table and table tags in question/.

Having both versions is definitely nice for the non-broadband people but I do like the version with the pictures a bit more. With the pictures there it somehow seems easier to read. I can’t think of how you can improve the text-only one though so good job!