Interesting question, I’m wondering about the same. I can’t answer your question, though, since we haven’t started any wars since the Viking Age (Unless you count Denmark’s participation in the Napoleonic Wars when we were under their rule).
I don’t reckon the Korea War is mentioned in your history book either? Though the cold war is perhaps glorified tome degree?
Anyway, if I’m allowed, here’s a follow-up question: How are you taught to look at history?
What do I mean by that? Recently we had a girl from the States (visiting another girl in our class)with us during history class. During that particular class we were studying the events leading to WW2. One of the main-frame questions was “Why did Hitler come to power?” The American girl wondered about this and said that at the same history level in the US, they didn’t ask questions like that. They were taught that things happened then and then and so and so. Our teacher asked why they didn’t ask questions about or reflected on history. She didn’t have any good answer, but added that at higher education they might.
So, where am I going at? Do you think reflection upon history is important? Were you ever told that it was during class when you were 16-19? Why? Why not?
Personally I heartily believe that reflection and questions concerning history are important. It’s okay to know that something did happen, but if you search for the reasons as to why it happened, you can prevent (bad) history from repeating itself. The two prime examples are WW2 and 9/11:
If you knew why Hitler came to power, how the chain of events led to his dictatorship, you are able to notice those same outlines later in history - when you’re writing history yourself. For instance, he was rather charismatic, he had his strong belief and a will to bring glory to Germany. He gave people work, either in factories (war equipment, among other), or working on the infrastructure, etc. He bought prosperity to the country in a time of depression. This gave the people confidence in the man, and once confidence, loyalty and power reached their highest level, he could do pretty much whatever he wanted. (This is, of course the short form of it, and only taken from the top of my head.)
The reason I’m mentioning 9/11 when talking about history and understanding history isn’t to rip up any old wounds people might have, but to give a very practical example of how ones history view comes too short. As I understand it, the consensus in the US today is that going into Iraq wasn’t such a good idea after all. I don’t want to speculate how this is so, but I suspect things surrounding these are beginning to be a little clearer for the Americans.
Okay, on with the example: The world’s superpower no. 1 is under attack. What does the news say? Terrorist attack, hijacking, etc. They’re reviewing the details concerning the attack over and over again. People are saying: “How did this happen? Why us? How could this be? We never did anything wrong.” A more correct thing to say would be: “Ok, this is the brutal reality. It did happen. But I suppose we had it coming, more or less. The question that remains is how do we prevent this from happening again?” or something along those lines. (I’m not saying all the innocent people lost that day deserved it, I’m just stating an example of history reflection here). If you, as an American, started to raise questions about your nation’s behaviour and actions internationally and in the middle east for the past decade or so once the attack was a fact, you would’ve found out that an attack like this could’ve happened any time. The ironic thing here is that at my side of the Lake, professors, peace researchers and experts weren’t even slightly surprised. But still, USA had the whole world’s sympathy. They used it to go to war and look forward, not taking a little time to contemplate on their navel. While the sympathy was well justified (I’m by no means saying anything else), it should’ve been used better. Anyway, before I tumble myself into something too big to swallow, read this: Understanding Oil, it’s a rather good essay.
To finish what I’m trying at with all this 9/11-history thing: If you ever watch the movie World Trade Center, you’ll notice that no questions are asked about the attack, the story is centered around two people talking to each other under a pile of rubble and their family. There is so much more the director should’ve included, thousands suffered and when making a film about such a tragedy without asking any questions to it is a waste. Watch the movie. Watch it not because of its quality (which is plain horrible), but too see how shallow one can make a movie about a historic event. Then, afterwards, you can watch Bowling for Columbine, Fahrenheit 9/11, Supersize Me and eventually Al Gore’s new documentary for some quality (true, they’re documentaries and WTC is not, but that’s not the point).
I’ll wrap up:
Ragnarok’s question: How do your history books talk about wars you’ve started or lost?
My follow-up: How are you taught to look at history?