# For those who think we're ban-happy

I don’t see how this is relevant. O_o

If I wear a porcelain mask and start a revolution, may I be excused in the banning for excellent taste in references? Or no. . .

unfortunately you did not refute my arguments because you do not understand the evidence. As such you are regretfully banned.

anyway, I nominate SK to enter a rebuttal to Troy’s discourse in that thread.

It won’t work. Everyone has accurately refuted it. Troy, as the sole and decidedly non-neutral judge, has made up excuses to get around their refutations, interestingly, by not understanding the refutations. Most notably in the ‘wordgames’ instance.
Troy will not allow his proof to have holes found in it, although a simple hole may be found in the strawman basis, cardstacking, and stepskipping that bases the entire proof. In math terms, he says something is true because lines A and B are parellel, without proving (or having as given information) that lines A and B are, in fact, parallel. Thus, his proof depends on an indefinite, which is invalid.

I’d still like to see him give it a shot. He won’t convince him but at least I have faith that he’ll at least make him sweat a bit.

Win that 10k SK

I clicked the link and I got a pop-up about god even though I am a christian<==stocker information lol

WAIT! This ass wrote all of this to prove that God is…whatever, so due to the powers of ‘god’ is flowing through him into our accounts thus making us bannable. jist please?

His entire “proof” is axiomatic. As such, no one can actually make him “sweat”, or even see any hint of light through his veil of ignorance.

This is probably just one of the counter-offers made in response to the <a href=“http://www.randi.org/”>James Randi Educational Foundation’s</a> offer of \$1 million to whoever can prove under rigorously defined test conditions the existence of the supernatural or some supernatural power. They have a good weekly column there.

More comedy gold from there:

His TOS, basically stating that it is bannable to disagree with him
http://biblocality.com/forums/rules.php

Part 1 of the nonsense you have to agree or else get ip banned:

<a href=“http://img225.imageshack.us/my.php?image=whackjobqs11rx.png” target="_blank"><img src=“http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/6348/whackjobqs11rx.th.png” border=“0” alt=“Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us” /></a>

Part 2:
<a href=“http://img358.imageshack.us/my.php?image=whackjobqs22vw.png” target="_blank"><img src=“http://img358.imageshack.us/img358/7343/whackjobqs22vw.th.png” border=“0” alt=“Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us” /></a>

Part 3, the ladies out there will love this one:
<a href=“http://img225.imageshack.us/my.php?image=whackjobqs32tz.png” target="_blank"><img src=“http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/1517/whackjobqs32tz.th.png” border=“0” alt=“Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us” /></a>

I dunno, calling the feds might not have been so stupid as it sounds. Look up Operation Sundevil, and if you’re brave, Operation Candyman, and <a href=“http://agora.rpgclassics.com/showthread.php?t=22754”>other comic escapades</a>.

I’m pretty sure you could get them to investigate David Copperfield for the theft of the Statue of Liberty if you tried hard enough. I mean, there’s like, <i>video evidence</i>.

It’s amazing how bad a writer he is. It’s like he after he finished his essay, he looked up every single word in a thesaurus, and then switched them for the biggest looking words listed. Nevermind about whether his argument is valid or not - I can’t even understand what the hell his arguement is! He uses horrible syntax and completely nonsensical phrasings, then tries to hide it behind long and intelligent sounding words. Just because it bothers me so much, I’ve started to edit his essay for grammar, syntax, flow, and coherency while trying to stay as true to what is being said as possible. I’ll post it when I’ve finished if there’s any interest.

Better yet, post it THERE

After I translated roughly a third of his essay into english, I realized that his argument wasn’t anything new at all - he’s just plagarized the cosmological argument. I told him as much on his forum, albeit in as nice a way as possible. Since the cosmological argument is considered to be a dead argument, he’d damn well better give me my \$10,000. If I do get it, I’ll donate half to RPGC.

Yeah… uh…

Good luck with that

See rule 1 on his forum. Enjoy your b&.

EVERYONE IN THIS THREAD IS BANNED EVEN YOU ZERO ARRRGH

you kidding? \$10,000? he doesn’t have that much. he’d hafta cash in his million dollar vocabulary to pay that much.

pwnd

I think he might have actually deleted GM’s post without responding to it.