I am gonna try to hit everythign in one swing here…
I never once said i was okay with the patriot act, and never one said the democrats were wrong for being against it. the patriot act is bull shit on paper, no matter who wrote it. As for using 30 round magazines as opposed to 10 and 20 round magazines, it is much easier to have 30, and much cheaper. Shooting 30 bullets instead of 10 isnt considered to be wrekless, and cant be compared to wrekless driving. Especially if you are having a contest at fast shooting. 10 rounds will be gone in less than half a minute. You just dont know about guns, and it’s my bet, you dont own or carry any firearms, so you dont care about them, or the people’s right to have them.
As for going after Saddam and Bin Laden. Saddam was a known terrorist with a big history of it. He not only funded and supplied terrorist groups, but it is my opinion that it was Saddam to put Bin Laden up to what he did, and possibly even supplied the means and funding in which to carry it out. Saddam was a nasty zit that needed to be popped, no doubt about it, and if you disagree than you go spend a week in Iraq for yourself and ask the people themselves about Saddam.
Bin Laden is just the blackhead, blackheads tend to be deeper, and harder to get rid of than zit’s… I hate both, zits and blackheads…
Like I said, get the authority to haev the competition. Fuck, in Marine Corps qualifications and competitions we don’t even need 30 round magazines and we still have rapid fire. Afterall, competitions are just so much more important than safety.
So, bin Laden did that for years and we didn’t go after him until he acted. Why should we go after Saddam then? Also, we used to be allies with him.
Bin Laden is just the blackhead, blackheads tend to be deeper, and harder to get rid of than zit’s… I hate both, zits and blackheads…
I’m just amazed you compared terrorists with acne.
And by the way, your arguement didn’t make snese, as was noted by everyone else. No sense repeating what they said.
Wait. If nobody’s up to the task of running the United States, then why do people run for President? Would there have been so many Presidents if NOBODY was up to the job.
A President is in charge of managing his country and ensuring the common welfare of the people. Think about what Bush has done for us. Pretty much NOTHING. The economy hasn’t gotten better, health and education aren’t any better, and all I can think of Bush actually doing is starting various petitions to drill for oil, and since those failed, the only time that he HAS spent on this nation is wasted.
Now, let’s look at Iraq. We have Saddam Hussein, so why is Bush still keeping troops there? He claimed long ago that he wanted to go after terrorists and nuclear weapons, which we haven’t found in Iraq. All Bush is doing is draining this country’s resources on a single foreign country. I can think of nothing that we’re doing except causing riots and guerilla attacks. So why would Bush be a good leader?
It is because the country is extremely unstable and we are the ones who made it unstable. That means that it is up to us to fix the country and get it in good shape, or at least able to function. The job may be done with Saddam, but there is still a lot of work to do there.If we leave, the war won’t stop, it may take another form, but it won’t stop.