Beatles or the Stones

I only meant that The Beatles, as they were, are dead now! Hehehe… we all know John, and Ringo are alive and well. And as for George… he was a sweet one.

And I’d have to say that I agree there. I might just be very easy… but I’ve never found an album which just stars the one or two songs in its name.
Favourite song - “Let It Be”

Ninten:cool:

Wow what a tough question…ummm well If you go by good songs…(in my opinion)

Stones-Street Fighting Man, Satisfaction, Jumpin’ Jack Flash, You Can’t always get what you want, Sympathy for the devil, Start me up,

Beetles- Eleanor Rigby, Help!,Yellow Submarine, Lady Madonna, Sgt. Peppers lonley hart club band, I want to hold your hand

Advantage-Even.

Well how about live?

Well the stones have dominated the tour scene for years, but the beetles were so powerful when they were around…damn

Advantage-Even

Musical Ability (Instruments)

hmm tough one…I think that talent wise the Beetles were just too good…

Advantage- Beetles

Musical Ability (Vocal)
Stones. Just for the stage presence…and the lips

Intangables

Overall, The classic Stones/Beatles debate comes down to this…the beatles are dead…I know this sounds bad but it really makes a difference…I don’t know if the Beetles could still be going now…The stones have proven that they can still do what they do with high quality.

Overall- Stones by a hair

Dear Sir or Madame, can you read my book?
It took me years to write, will you take a look?
It’s based on a novel by a man named Lear
And I need a job and I want to be a paperback writer… paperback writer

It’s a dirty story of a dirty man
And his clinging wife doesn’t understand
His son is working for the Daily Mail
It’s a steady job and he wants to be a paperback writer… paperback writer

It’s 1000 pages, give or take a few
I’ll be writing more in a week or two
I can make it longer if you like the style
I can change it 'round and I want to be a paperback writer…paperback writer

If you really like it you can have the rights
It can make a million for you overnight
If you must return it you can send it here
But I need a break, and I want to be a paperback writer…paperback writer

Paperback writer…

John is alive and well? HIS ASSASINATION WAS A LIE?! AND PAUL REALLY WAS KILLED IN A CAR CRASH IN THE 60S? =O

(For those who don’t know, there was a HUGE rumor in the 60s that Paul was dead, and they found a look-a-like to take Paul’s place in the band, but the other Beatles kept referencing his death in their songs and album covers and stuff… it’s pretty interesting some of the stuff people have came up with to support the “Paul is Dead” conspiracy. =P)

Given a choice, I’d have to go with the Stones, simply because I universally prefer the bluesy sound, but I personally agree with Joe Strummer: ‘No elvis, beatles or the rolling stones.’ None of the artists have my favourite musical traits, and both of them have had albums I never really liked. John Lenon’s solo stuff, (by which I mean ‘Working Class Hero,’ and ‘Working Class Hero,’ maybe even ‘Working Class Hero’) is pretty good.

EDIT: Oh, and I would agree the Beatles are a musically better group, with the exception of Keith Richards. That man is one of the greatest rythm guitarists of all time, and the sole reason I listen to the Stones at all.

I dunno. I might have. I don’t know most songs by name, which is why I said I can’t name many of their songs.