Detective Blues

The Core Media Forum
#15

I’ll agree with GAP that your two elements aren’t necessarily required, particularly the good grammar. However, I will also agree with GAP that you need to personally have a good, if not great, grasp of grammar, syntax, diction if you are going to break the rules. Oftentimes, breaking the rules consistently without sounding like a retard is harder than following traditional high school grammar. Look at Faulkner. He constantly ignored quotation marks, and proper punctuation is often a hallmark of “good” grammar. However, he had such a great understanding of how proper punctuation is used that he was able to intentionally break the rules n a consistent manner. See As I Lay Dying, for instance. James Joyce too, I believe, is also a hallmark of breaking traditional rules, but doing it in a consistent way. I guess both fall under the more general rule of “be understandable,” but good grammar in the actual writing is not necessary for a work to be understandable.

As for the work needs to make sense, making sense is somewhat of a loose guideline. I don’t really see what differentiates “makes sense” from “be understandable.”

#16

We’re totally the only people that find this funny. Anyway:

You catch me in bed with your girlfriend

“Uh… this isn’t what it looks like! I couldn’t take any other sources into account. To understand a text you have to be inside her! Wait, I mean…”

#17

Sorry Weii, but that’s just wrong. Hey, I can’t blame you, I used to think that way myself. But, I’ve gotten more open-minded with the years, and I’ve come to accept the fact that, if a person really enjoys making crappy stories with poor grammar and posting them online even if everybody tells him or her how much they suck, he has all the right in the world to do it. WE the readers are the ones who are getting too uppity with our demands; not only cannot everybody be a good writer, but we don’t have the right to demand that everything fits our standards of quality. It’s like telling children they can’t break the rules of a game when they’re having fun playing it their way. Besides, obviously there ARE fans for that kind of junk- not all comments posted on those stories are “this sucks”. We gotta respect that; there’s more than enough people like us who like to read and write quality stories to fill our desires. If you don’t like a posted story, just avoid it.

On the other hand, you may also post things on the net because you want critique in order to improve, and getting comments on what you can do better, as well as practicing, is the only way to improve. And if you don’t get pointers at your weak points, practicing might not do much good either.
This is of course true, for those people who want to improve their writing skills. Just remember that not everybody cares.

#18

I know that one! A Boy and His Dog, right?
:suckah::uga:

#19

Of course it’s wrong to grief people just for the sake of griefing. But again, when you put a piece of fanfiction or anything created by yourself up on the internet, it’s no longer a piece for only yourself and your enjoyment - you’re looking for an audience, and the “payment” you hope to recieve for your effort is comments, preferably good.

It’s everyone’s right to publish something on the internet, because that’s included in the right of free speech (using that term even if it’s relative, because the net is not the US). But in the same vein, it’s also everyone’s right to comment and speak their mind about what they see posted. If somebody posts something that’s simply bad, people are going to say so.

Of course there are different levels to how one can say something. The problem is that most people in the Western world are raised to think that they are special snowflakes and deserve only praise, reading even constructive criticism as flames. Challenging those who unfavorably comment on the story with such things as “don’t like, don’t read!” or “If you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all,” which is what you seem to argue for, is just a form of attempting to censor critics simply because they disagree.

Let’s go to extremes just for the fun of it. If somebody posts a story entitled, and with the plot, Raping Amanda Bynes and Avril Lavigne, or The Angel of Death (jewish Mary Sue in concentration camp dates Josef Mengele and has sex with him outside a freshly used gas chamber “after the screams died out”), people are generally not going to react favorably to that. In at least the second case, the author was (or at least appeared to be) genuinely baffled and offended when she got flamed for her story. I haven’t read it, but the excerpts show that it had good grammar and structure at least. Not touching that first one with a twenty-foot pole (Avril Lavigne’s lawyers chased that one off the net for at least a while, if I recall correctly). So yeah, the authors are free to post it, but a lot of people are morally, you have to agree, in their full right to say that they’re sickos.

And to end of a less morbid but still relevant note, if somebody posts a Naruto/Warcraft crossover with the father of all Naruto Gary Stus as the main character and no understanding for why people would think a romance story with a Forsaken might be a rather strange idea (if there’s no hint of irony or comedy), not to mention rather loose grip of storytelling and grammar, I’m personally going to say “this is a godawful piece of crap and here’s why.”

#20

“don’t like, don’t read!” or “If you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all,” which is what you seem to argue for, is just a form of attempting to censor critics simply because they disagree.

That’s not what I’m arguing for. What I am saying is that in these cases, the blame almost always goes to the author, with many readers acting as if, just because something is posted online, it HAS to be of at least good quality or they lambast it. That’s not always true and we need to acknowledge it.

I would be much happier if there were no crappy stories online, and if everyone would heed constructive criticism; but that’s just not the case, and we must accept it- specially in the cases where the author is perfectly aware of his or her shortcomings but doesn’t care or even likes it that way- look at Fanfiction.net; it’s full of crap, true, but obviously SOME people like that stuff or it wouldn’t be allowed in the first place!

If a particular forum doesn’t have specific rules regarding the type of stories published there or their quality, we can’t complain about it. On the other hand, it IS true that if said forum has no rules about the criticism allowed then the author has no call on getting pissed by the comments put there. I just wish that people in general (authors and writers both) would learn to just ignore what they don’t like.

(Oh, and by the way, WHY would you even read a story that has “Raping” in its very title? “The Angel of Death” maybe, because that can have other meanings, but with the first example, you’re just asking to be offended. And in the second case, you can stop the moment you realize what it’s about.)

#21

I don’t know how I feel about the argument that, even if things would be better another way, we should just leave them the way they are, make no attempt to fix/change it, and accept things as they are. That kind of seems like it’s why the world is such a shithole.

I really just don’t feel this line of thinking is particularly constructive.

#22

Please note I’m talking about bothering people who DON’T want our criticism, not that constructive criticism should never be offered. Seriously guys, do you EVER put yourself in these people’s shoes? Maybe it’s a kid writing it. Or someone with dyslexia. Or someone who just likes writing that way, or just can’t help it (not everyone has the talent to be a good writer.) Should THAT keep them from writing fanfiction? Hell no! Again, if they’re having fun, let them! ESPECIALLY if the stuff they write does have its fans, as twisted as we may find them. Sorry, but to me the idea that because something is posted in the Net where everyone can see it MUST comply with some people’s ideas of writing is just wrong. That would be like saying that there could not be comedy on TV, only dramas. I hate cartoons like South Park, but it has its fans. Should it be canceled just because many of us find it unbearable? No. Art is a matter of personal taste. Give advice only where it’s wanted.

#23

I think the point is that, if something is placed in a public forum designed for discussion, it’s somewhat to be presumed that criticism is at least accepted unless the author specifically states otherwise.

No-one is arguing that all writing on the internet has to comply with our desires, only that there isn’t really anything wrong or cruel in politely expressing one’s opinion of the writing. I don’t even think that all published, professional writing must (or even should) conform to my tastes, however, that does not mean I don’t believe I may express that I dislike it.

It certainly shouldn’t be canceled because of that, but you should be allowed to state that you hate it.

#24

I’m not even sure why we’re discussing the ethics of criticizing or not criticizing, considering the writer of the original piece said:

Thus, what I (among others) posted were perfectly within bounds. I’m not out to hurt GSG’s feelings, and I don’t think anyone else in the thread was. We offered advice because it was asked for. I believe GSG is earnest in his desire to write, and so I would be a bit of an ass if I weren’t to give him the best advice I had to offer.

#25

I’m just going to answer why anybody would read anything with rape in the title. I certainly wouldn’t, unless the summary gives me good reason to, for example if it seems that the story will handle the matter seriously. There are a lot of reasons to keep reading, for some people, even if they realize that it’s a horrible story either by subject or writing.

  1. Trainwreck syndrome - it’s so horrible but you just can’t look away
  2. It’s so horrible that it’s bizarre and you start laughing
  3. It’s so horrible that you keep reading to make a proper case when you give the author either constructive criticism or tell them the truth bluntly

I go for reason 2 when I actively seek out badly written fanfiction (which I probably do more often than I should). I look for really stupid crap, not horrble crap, such as the Naruto/Warcraft story I mentioned above, or another Warcraft story where one paladin singlehandedly invades a fortified keep and nobody notices this because he insta-kills all the guards and other people there by fatally stabbing them in the kidneys before they can scream. That was just one of the problems with that one.

In the case of the rape story I mentioned, the people who alerted Avril Lavigne’s lawyers very possibly read it through to be sure what they were talking about.

I find your arguments that we should just let things be, very flawed. True, there is no truly right or wrong in writing when it gets down to it. However, when somebody does something, somebody else reacts. Action and reaction and all that. At the core, it’s the same thing as instructing somebody on how to do their job, or perhaps more illustrative in this case, reacting to something a politician said and writing a letter to the newspapers to debate it. Reactions are good. If somebody doesn’t want reactions, well, the only way to avoid that is to not do anything at all, in this case not show their writing to people.

Let me put it this way. I like to think that I’m a decent writer these days, but the stuff I used to write when I first got here was BAD. I would have benefited a lot from more constructive criticism than I got, but I dunno if we were all still too young to dare being honest, or if I gave the impression that I couldn’t handle people being honest (u’re all being meen!), but at that point I didn’t ask anybody to correct my grammar before I posted (“Well, you was not really dead.” Christ on a cracker!), and there’s stuff I remember that should have been advised taken out. Which made me look like a moron. The only reason I haven’t asked to have stuff like “Hanging around” taken down from here, and still keep it on my ff.net account, is because I know I started out a happy amateur and there’s a process to becoming good. A process that is helped by getting constructive criticism (even if I didn’t ask for it then) as well as honest praise. Sorc spoke well about this kind of thing in 2003. It’s still a sticky, after all.

#26

By the way, even if the subject matter is gruesome, that doesn’t mean it should be out of bounds for writers or readers. For instance, Gaspar Noé’s movie Irreversible may have been wordofmouthed as MonicaBellucciSexlulz, but it didn’t take its subject lightly and was far removed from the lulz.

edit: Also, Lolita, Tod in Venedig etc.

#27

Thank you, Weiila.

The fact is, once a story’s online, it’s fair game. The writer has to realize they are no longer just sharing this with family and friends (if they even have any of the latter); anyone from anywhere can read it. And if they don’t like something, they have every right to let their opinions be known. Granted, a lot of people don’t put any thought into what they say (this stroy suxx0rs LOL!), but that does not excuse the writer from ignoring constructive criticism.

Now, can we have ONE THREAD in this fucking forum that doesn’t degenerate into a completely irrelevant topic?

#28

Now where’s the fun in THAT? :smiley:

#29

I don’t mind the arguments, but we really should start separate threads to avoid massive derailments.

#30

And derail the derails till we have to post in the original thread.

#31

I’d like to offer a counterpoint, since everyone here seems to be agreeing with Galloway that this is a “derailment.”

If you look at the first post in the last post, you can see a big gap between what the topic originally was and what the topic is. This is only natural in most interesting threads; it means that we’re engaged in the discussion. If you look at the first post then read each post in order, you will find that the conversation flows naturally and logically. We’re not being derailed; we just didn’t know where the train was going. This isn’t like the Sabin thread.

#32

If something gets derailed, the original topic wasn’t as good as the new one. It’s kind of like highlander, take one topics head and the posts along with it.

#33

That doesn’t necessarily follow. I would have never posted if I wasn’t interested in giving you some advice.

#34

I guess your right, I didn’t see the post right before my last one.