I donāt fucking remember.
I liked AC1 more than 2. And the controls are nearly the same as PoP 
Heh.
I think an indian assassin would be cool, but it wouldnāt really go with the story unless they got somebody else.
I donāt understand what you mean by any of this, can you clarify?
If you follow the story itās more likely for an asian assassin to be the focus of the next game.
edit: just read the CAD comic. I love the idea, and ultimately, this is what I love about the series. Taking the next game to Renassaince Italy was brillant, I can only imagine what they have in store for the next game. And that comic site had one thing a little off; he assumes the series has to go forward in time. Thereās nothing stopping it from going back further than Altair.
Why would it make sense for an asian assassin based on the story so far? Explain, sir.
The clues for it are in the ending to Assassins Creed 1. I canāt remember everything but one of the images is an island. I found it online, itās an island in the Japanese archipeloago, and the last codex in AC2 has Altair mentioning Ghengis Kahn. Although they already stated that AC3 will involve Ezio, somehow.
Oh, ok. I know exactly what youāre talking about now. That could probably be told, but I wouldnāt see the point of it. We know what happens there.
If they traveled there, that explains why the codex wound up in the hands of Kublai Khan, who Marco Polo took the pages from and brought back to Italy, allowing one of Ezioās great grandfathers to obtain them. So yeah, its totally doable, but it would seem kind of pointless to me. But who knows.
Also, AC2: Episodes will star Ezio, not AC3. Ubisoft shouldāve done a better job than to say āthe next AC game will have Ezio gaiz!ā
Iām only speaking from my experience with the first game, so forgive me if the second one is HOT SHIT.
It doesnāt suck because you press one button to fight. It sucks because the storyline is contrived, the game is too short, and it feels like it was rushed out the door. You can play Assassinās Creed onceā¦ MAYBE. I dare you to replay it doing the same retarded minigames before each assassination. And marvel at how the difficulty is artificially bumped up in the last fight, when in a STEALTH GAME you are forced to fight several people head on. Hooray! Ohā¦ but waitā¦ if you know how to counter, itās still retardedly easy. At any rateā¦ I think Assassinās Creed sucks, but not for the poorly-thought out āreasonā that GSG cites.
Yeah, you should give the second one a play through if you gave the first one. Itās much better.
This is going to be the next Lost.
The storyline really jumps off at the end of the first game. Ultimately I think that the AC2 flashback involving Altair and that woman (and that god awful jump) will figure in. It kinda draws me away from my earlier sentiment of taking the series back before Altair. The games about Desmond and his heritage, not so much the Assassins themselves. Perhaps it could involve Altairās sons in asia. How precarious would that be, I wonder, to be a round eye.
The woman in the flashback is Maria. Sheās the Templar woman Altair spared at the end of the AC1. They get closer to each other in AC: Bloodlines.. As far as Asia, I suppose we can only wait and see.
I liked AC2 a lot more than AC1, it just felt much more polished (even if it was so bloated it could barely support its own weight). For AC3 Iām actually thinking the French Revolution would be an awesome backdrop. Can you think of anyone more Templar than Robespierre? 
Iāve only played the PSP version but its a lot of fun! I love sneaking up on the Templars. Some times I reward the holy ones for their good deeds with a one slash trip to heaven and martyrdom and the sinful ones go south without suntan lotion!
The psp oneā¦ What the fuck?
Wow. If you actually enjoyed Bloodlines, play the main series. Much better
Now that my newphew has the xbox 360 I intend too