I.E. WTF was I thinking? I’ve been looking over my old shrine, and wow. It just looks like ass. So I’m redoing most of it.
This is pretty much the old monster list style, which I’m working on now:
http://tartarus.rpgclassics.com/staff/homm3/infernoc.shtml
This is the new monster list style.
http://tartarus.rpgclassics.com/staff/homm3/castlec.shtml
So tell me what you think?
Personally I think the ‘New’ style would look a lot better if only the name of the unit had < th > tags instead of the entire left side. Make it easier to see the rest, as well as to see where one creature ends and another begins. Example.
Possibly. I’ll try it.
Speaking of suchlike, I just downloaded a HoMM3 demo. It’s good (and cheap! :D). Would you say it was better or worse than HoMM4?
Actually I like the old style better. >>
Although if you want to improve it you should write more comments and not focus on the stats. Anyone can see their stats just by right clicking on the monster, and it’s not like you’ll ever really change your strategy based on stats.
And I would say 3 is a little better than 4 Pier
I never played HoM&M4…
Fair enough CH. But I just wrote whatever came to mind, and really just wanted to summarize each monster in a couple of sentences.
Actually, I do need to ask: what is it about the old style that you liked more?
Personally, I like the new style better. I can’t really expalin it, but it looks more orgainized.
I’ll get cranking on the walthroughs as soon as I get a chance. College and work have been taking the most of my time lately.
New.