100 % American

I feel the need to share this with everyone again; last time I posted this, a lot of people weren’t here and I just think its a neat text puts things into perspective.

100% American
Our solid American citizen awakens in a bed built on a pattern which originated in the Near East but which was modified in Northern Europe before it was transmitted to America. He throws back covers made of cotton, domesticated in India, or linen, domesticated in the Near East, or wool from sheep, also domesticated in the Near East, or silk , the use of which was discovered in China. All of these materials have been spun and woven by processes invented in the Near East. He slips into his moccasins, invented by the Indians of the Eastern woodlands, and goes to the bathroom, whose fixtures are a mixture of European and American inventions, both of recent date. He takes off his pajamas, a garment invented in India, and washes with soap invented by teh ancient Gauls. He then shaves, a masochistic rite which seems to have been derived from either the Sumer or ancient Egypt.

Returning to the bedroom, he removes his clothes from a chair of southern European type and proceeds to dress. He puts on garments whose form originally derived from the skin clothing of the nomads of the Asiatic steppes, puts on shoes mde from skins tanned by a process invented in ancient Egypt and cut to a pattern derived from the classical civilizations of the Mediterranean , and ties around his neck a strip of bright-colored cloth which is vestigial survival of the shoulder brawls worn by the seveteenth-century Croatians. Before going out for breakfast he glances through the window, made of glass invented in Egypt, and if it is raining puts on overshoes made of rubber discovered by by the Central American Indians and takes an umbrella, invented in southeastern Asia. Upon his head he puts on a hat made of felt, a material invented in the Asiatic steppes.

On his way to breakfast he stops to buy a paper, paying for it with coins, an ancient Lydian invention. At the restaurant a whole new series of borrowed elements confronts him. His plate is made of a form of pottery invented in China. His knife is of steel, an allow first made in southern India, his fork a medieval Italian invention, and his spoon a derivative of a Roman original. He begins breakfast with an orange, from the eastern Mediterranean, a canteloupe from Persia, or perhaps a piece of African watermellon. With this he has coffee, an Abyssinian plant, with cream and sugar. Both the domestication of cows and the idea of milking them originated in the Near East, while sugar was first made in India. After his fruit and first coffee, he goes on to waffles, cakes made by a Scandinavian technique from wheat domesticated in Asia Minor. Over these he pours maple syrup, invented by the Indians of the Eastern woodlands. As a side dish he may have the egg of a species of bird domesticated in Indo-China, or thin strips of the flesh of an animal domesticated in Eastern Asia which have been salted and smoked by a process developed in northern Europe.

When our friend has finished eating he settles back to smoke , an American Indian habit, consuming a plant domesticated in Brazil in either a pipe, derived from the Indians of Virgina, or even attempt a cigarette, derived from Mexico. If he is hardy enough he may even attempt a cigar, transmitted to us from the Antilles by way of Spain. While smoking he reads teh news of the day, imprinted in characters invented by the ancient Semites upon a material invented in China by a process invented in Germany. As he absorbs the accounts of foreign troubles he will , if he is a good conservative citizen, thank a Hebrew deity in an Indo-European language that he is 100 per cent American.

  • Ralph Linton, The study of Man, an Introduction, pp326-327. Published in 1936.

Neat.

Goes to show that national borders are an outdated and primitive construction that should be removed. Anyway, the text is worth cookies, which probably aren’t American either.

Well… isn’t most of western Europe on its way to something like that?

Not really, they’re just moving the borders from a national to a regional level. Not only that, but those borders are actually more restrictive than those on national level used to be. And I dislike the centralisation of power.

The New World fucking sucks now.

edit; Really fucking sucks.

The new world doesn’t suck. Look at the southern half ot it. In Brazil we acknowledge that everything has a little piece of every part of the world in it. But here, people are like that too.

Hey something’s gotta come from somewhere else. If someone claims that a particular product is all-American, and unless one physically sees that shit being made in the US, then they’re usually full of shit. Besides, the American is the mutt of the world, a mix of many different arts, cultures, and mannerisms all crammed into one package. Unfortunately we’ve taken a little too much pride in that and became more arrogant than Parisians sometimes.

Holy shit, people import stuff? HOW VILE!!

People have been trading and importing and exporting goods and ideas all throughout history. If Europe hadn’t stole a bunch of ideas and inventions from the Middle East and Asia, they might still be stuck in the Middle Ages.

The world has shifted to a global market. Would you rather all nations be isolationist and not trade with each other at all?

How can we make this argument on so much ancient history? Though some of these were brought about after the foundation of the States, many more of these predate our nation. Though I would certainly agree that we are very much a conglomeration of many civilizations over the years, how can we argue that things which have spread throughout the empires of man ages ago are not just as American in nature as they are international? Why not focus on the current and ongoing internationalism that subtly influences our lives?

I don’t know, I just think that the argument is somewhat weakened by the fact that some of our culteral ancestors were named in the list of things that aren’t American about america.

:hint: over 40% of the US is German

Hiryuu kinda missed the point of the quote :P.

I dunno, I found it pretty funny. Though that could be because I’m not American.

I think that the article may be attacking blind nationalism that exists not only within America, but in any other reasonably developed country; not the fact that nations trade goods. Not only does the article demonstrate the dependence of different cultures on one another, but it also shows the assimilations of different aspects of a culture to such a degree that we no longer think about its origins.

That’s true.

The post, however, was drawing attention to the fact that many people proud of the fact that they ‘support American companies’ or ‘buy American’ do not in fact do so and I’m going to go over there now.

Most of the South Americans are unclassifiable crossbreeds between European immigrants and native tribes. Argentina was once called the “Furnace of Races” because just about every race in the world got mixed with each other in here, that’s why nearly pure blooded anything like me are so rare.

The world, as it is now, is what could be called Hitler’s worst nightmare. There aren’t 100% anything anymore and almost everyone has a little bit of everything on every aspect.

A good reason to get rid of terrifs. Hurray free trade!

We need to get rid of bariffs and tarriars to free trade.

You spelled tree frade wrong.

No, George W Bush did, when he said it.

Thank you Klez.